I am an environmental economist at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA). I am affiliated with CEEP, the Climate School, and the Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). From 2023 to 2024, I was a Senior Advisor in the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). I study how forecasts and other types of information affect actions in settings including adaptation to climate change, risk-taking in research, and time use. These days, I am especially fascinated by how people perceive and use weather forecasts—a decades-long information intervention going on every hour of the day, all around the world.

Contact information

Jeffrey Shrader
Associate Professor
Columbia University, SIPA

jgs2103@columbia.edu
Office hours: Mondays 9 to 10, IAB 1430A or Thursdays 11 to noon on Zoom (click here to book)

Latest news and updates

New paper in PNAS, joint with the wonderful Sustainable Development PhD student Stephan Thies as well as the usual suspects on my weather forecast work (Derek, Laura, Manuel). Headline findings: More accurate weather forecasts save lives, especially during extreme heat. Continued improvements in short-range temperature forecasts could reduce heat-related mortality in the U.S. by ~20% by the end of the century. That would offset nearly all of the increase in deaths under moderate climate change. But this is also “running to stay in place”: without climate change, these same improvements would lead to substantial declines in heat-related mortality. Surveyed operational meteorologists expect forecasts to keep improving, and realizing those improvements will require sustained investment in weather data and model development (including AI models).

Manuel Linsenmeier and I have a new piece in VoxDev on global inequalities in weather forecasts. As we say in the piece, “Weather forecasts in low-income countries are about 20 years behind those in high-income countries, worsening economic losses and increasing vulnerability to climate-related risks.” We also offer some thoughts on how to make this situation better!

Lots of work on the economics of climate change has sought to estimate climate change damage. As long as these estimates have been produced, there has been a debate about whether we should expect actual damages to be larger or smaller than the estimates. A common argument that actual damages should be smaller comes from folks focused on *adaptation*---the actions people take to prepare for or adjust to a changing climate. (...more)

I was interviewed for Signals of Change. Check out the episode here. We talk about climate adaptation, weather forecasts, and what environmental economists can do to better understand climate change impacts.

Link to all news and updates
You can subscribe to these updates using RSS